The University of British Columbia
UBC - A Place of Mind
The University of British Columbia Vancouver campus
Faculty of EducationDepartment of Curriculum & Pedagogy
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Overview
    • Message from Head
    • Strategic Plan
    • Academic & Social Life
    • For Media
    • Green Plan
    • Career Centre
  • Students
    • Welcome
    • Overview
    • Future Students
    • Current Students
  • Faculty
    • Faculty
    • Recent Faculty Publications
    • Adjunct Professors
    • Associate Members
    • Sessional Instructors
    • Postdoctoral Fellows
    • Visiting Scholars
    • Professors Emeriti & Non-Emeriti Retirees
    • In Memoriam
    • Faculty Resources
      • Meeting Dates
      • Dept Meeting Minutes
      • GAC Minutes
      • UAC Minutes
      • Info for Instructors
  • Programs
    • Overview
    • Doctorate Programs
    • Master’s Degrees
    • Curriculum Studies
    • Art Education
    • Business Education
    • Health, Outdoor and Physical Education
    • Home Economics Education
    • Indigenous Education
    • Mathematics Education
    • Media and Technology Studies Education
      • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Museum Education
    • Music Education
    • Rural Education and Rural Teacher Education
    • Science Education
    • Social Studies Education
    • Teacher Education
    • Curriculum and Leadership
  • Research
    • Overview
    • Interview Series
    • Research Funding
    • Funded Research Projects
    • Research Interests
  • Community
    • News Stories
    • In the Media
    • Current Events
    • Seminars
    • Featured Stories
    • Photo Gallery
  • Contact Us
    • Staff Directory
Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy
» Faculty of Education » Home » Constructivism – the good; the bad; and the abhorrent?
News Stories
Current Events
Seminars
Featured Stories
Photo Galleries

Constructivism – the good; the bad; and the abhorrent?

November 20, 2020


Keith S. Taber
Emeritus Professor of Science Education
University of Cambridge

Friday, December 11, 2020 | 9:30 to 11:00 am (PST)

Note: rescheduled from October 30, 2020

Host: Dr. Samia Khan

 

Abstract

Constructivism has been a key referent in education for some decades, and is widely seen across many national contexts as a ‘good’ to be promoted in teacher preparation and development. Constructivism can be seen as the basis of a research-informed perspective on learning that guides principled approaches to course design and teaching. Yet constructivist teaching has also been criticised by some influential commentators as misguided and ineffective pedagogy – with constructivism seen as something of a fashionable label capable of covering various instructional sins. This raises questions about how constructivism is understood and applied in different educational contexts; and how wider cultural factors can colour the perceptions of what, to many, is simply a common-sense reflection of what we know about learning. Moreover, in some scholarly circles, constructivism is distrusted as a position that is ideologically unsound: as something of a dangerous agent provocateur, a kind of fifth columnist within educational circles whose sympathies lie with the anti-rational side in the ‘science wars’. From this viewpoint, constructivism is not just wrong, but something of an evil – a kind of heresy. It is possible for educators to disregard this ideological debate if we choose to distinguish between the use of constructivism as a label for a perspective on learning, and a wider philosophical sense of constructivism as the basis of an epistemological theory. That is a move that is easy to make by claiming that we (in education) are only concerned with how students learn from the curriculum (i.e., what might be called psychological or pedagogical constructivism), and are not making claims about how knowledge is developed in disciplinary fields such as in the natural sciences. Yet that argument would seem to pre-suppose that knowledge development in an academic discipline is fundamentally different in nature to, and so relies on qualitatively distinct social and psychological processes from, those at work in student learning – which seems difficult to justify. This talk will seek to make sense of how constructivism can be evaluated so diversely from within different scholarly communities.

Bio
Dr. Keith Taber attended state schools before reading chemistry at university and then preparing to teach chemistry and physics. He worked as a science teacher in comprehensive schools, and then in a further education college; obtaining an MSc for girls’ under-representation in science and PhD by part-time study whilst teaching in the area of conceptual change. He then joined the Faculty of Education at Cambridge, initially working in teacher preparation, before shifting to teach educational research methods on graduate courses, as well as supervising student dissertation projects (mainly in areas of science education). Professor Taber just retired in September 2020. He is actively engaged at this time in scholarly projects and the publication of a new book. Most of his research and writing (https://science-education-research.com/ publications/) has been focussed around learning and teaching in the sciences. He has published seminal journal articles and numerous books, including those on student thinking and conceptual change.

 

Video


Back to top
Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy
Faculty of Education
Vancouver Campus
2125 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4
Tel 604 822 5422
Website edcp.educ.ubc.ca
Email edcp.educ@ubc.ca
Back to top
The University of British Columbia
  • Emergency Procedures |
  • Terms of Use |
  • Copyright |
  • Accessibility